One Last Help Guide For Veliparib — различия между версиями

Материал из Wiki портал КГАУ "КЦИОКО"
Перейти к: навигация, поиск
(Новая страница: «In the present survey, code 1 was the most prevalent caries code in the primary dentition. The fact that the prevalence of dental caries, diagnosed according to t…»)
 
(нет различий)

Текущая версия на 00:17, 17 августа 2019

In the present survey, code 1 was the most prevalent caries code in the primary dentition. The fact that the prevalence of dental caries, diagnosed according to the ICDAS II, was already very high in young children showed the low discriminating power of that system in identifying the level of seriousness of the disease. The fact that the very early sign of dental caries in enamel (code 1) is included in the system appears to be the reason. Although one never knows exactly if ICDAS II code 1 will progress, it has been demonstrated [28] that a considerable number of those lesions will not progress. It is, therefore, very likely that including very early signs of enamel carious lesions in a caries assessment system will overestimate the severity of dental Selleckchem NU7441 caries. The profession should be asked if they want to communicate to other health professionals and members of society in this manner. Using ICDAS ERK inhibitor II, an almost 100% prevalence of dental caries in primary teeth was observed at a young age in the present study. The same situation was applicable to caries prevalence in permanent teeth. Already at an age of 6 to 7?years, 63.7% of the children were affected by dental caries. This figure should be considered high, considering the fact that the permanent teeth had been erupted for about 1?year only. Herein, a mean d3mf3-t of 3.2?��?3.4 was observed, which is Veliparib in line with the studies conducted among 6-year-old Brazilian children in the last decade. Mean dmf-t scores ranging from 2.4 to 3.1 had been described in the literature [29�C31]. It was not possible to compare our results with those published by the Brazilian Health Ministry in 2003 [32] as children aged 6 to 7?years old were not included in their epidemiological survey. In general, the caries status of the sample was higher than expected and did not achieve the goal proposed by WHO for the year 2000, which was 50% of caries-free 6-year-old children, according to the DMF index [33]. Only 32.8% of our children presented a mean d3mf3-t score of 0. The findings confirmed the lack of a system capable of offering curative care for schoolchildren in Parano��. The m- and f-components were extremely low in comparison to the d-component. Only a few children had received treatment in the primary dentition. For the permanent dentition, practically no treatment was carried out. In the present survey, girls did not show a higher caries experience than boys, which is common [34]. Only an age effect for D2MF2-S was observed. Despite the 1-year age difference, 7-year-old children had more carious lesions in permanent teeth than children aged 6. This finding showed once more that erupting and just-erupted permanent molars are vulnerable to carious lesion development [35].